4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Upregulation of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 Pathway by Ras Homolog Enriched in Brain in Pancreatic β-Cells Leads to Increased β-Cell Mass and Prevention of Hyperglycemia

期刊

DIABETES
卷 58, 期 6, 页码 1321-1332

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db08-0519

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-Components of insulin/IGF-1 receptor-mediated signaling pathways in pancreatic beta-cells have been implicated in the development of diabetes, in part through the regulation of beta-cell mass. the protein Ras homolog in vivo. Studies in vitro have shown that, enriched in brain (Rheb) plays a key role as a positive upstream regulator of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway in integrating inputs from nutrients and growth factors for cell growth. Our objective was to investigate the role of the mTORC1 pathway in the regulation of beta-cell mass in vivo. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-We generated transgenic mice that, overexpress Rheb in beta-cells. We examined the activation of the mTORC1 pathway and its effects on beta-cell mass, on glucose metabolism, and on protection against, hyperglycemia. RESULTS-Immunoblots of islet extracts revealed that the phosphorylation levels of ribosomal protein S6 and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1, downstream effectors for mTORC1, were upregulated in transgenic beta-cells. Immunostaining of the pancreatic sections with anti-phospho-S6 antibody confirmed upregulation of the mTORC1 pathway in beta-cells in vivo. The mice showed improved glucose tolerance with higher insulin secretion. This arose from increased beta-cell mass accompanied by increased cell size. The mice also exhibited resistance to hyperglycemia induced by streptozotocin and obesity. CONCLUSIONS-Activation of the mTORC1 pathway by Rheb led to increased beta-cell mass in this mouse model without producing obvious unfavorable effects, giving a potential approach for the treatment of beta-cell failure and diabetes. Diabetes 58:1321-1332, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据