4.4 Article

Persistent expression of activated Notch inhibits corticotrope and melanotrope differentiation and results in dysfunction of the HPA axis

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 358, 期 1, 页码 23-32

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.07.004

关键词

Pituitary; Corticotrope; Melanotrope; Notch; HPA axis; SOX2

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R01DK076647A, T32 HD007333]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is an important regulator of energy balance, immune function and the body's response to stress. Signaling networks governing the initial specification of corticotropes, a major component of this axis, are not fully understood. Loss of function studies indicate that Notch signaling may be necessary to repress premature differentiation of corticotropes and to promote proliferation of pituitary progenitors. To elucidate whether Notch signaling must be suppressed in order for corticotrope differentiation to proceed and whether Notch signaling is sufficient to promote corticotrope proliferation, we examined the effects of persistent Notch expression in Pomc lineage cells. We show that constitutive activation of the Notch cascade inhibits the differentiation of both corticotropes and melanotropes and results in the suppression of transcription factors required for Pomc expression. Furthermore, persistent Notch signaling traps cells in the intermediate lobe of the pituitary in a progenitor state, but has no effect on pituitary proliferation. Undifferentiated cells are eliminated in the first two postnatal weeks in these mice, resulting in a modest increase in CRH expression in the paraventricular nucleus, hypoplastic adrenal glands and decreased stress-induced corticosterone levels. Taken together, these findings show that Notch signaling is sufficient to prevent corticotrope and melanotrope differentiation, resulting in dysregulation of the HPA axis. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据