4.7 Article

The determination of performances of polysulfone (PS) ultrafiltration membranes fabricated at different evaporation temperatures for the pretreatment of textile wastewater

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 316, 期 -, 页码 110-119

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.02.011

关键词

Polysulfone membrane; Textile industry; Dye-bath wastewater; Phase inversion; Evaporation temperature; Ultrafiltration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of evaporation temperature on properties and filtration performances of polysulfone membrane were investigated with a series of experiments. Membranes were fabricated by phase inversion process at five different evaporation temperatures (25 +/- 0.4, 35 +/- 0.6, 45 +/- 0.5, 55 +/- 0.5 and 65 +/- 0.6 degrees C). The resulted membranes were characterized by water permeability, MWCO (molecular weight cut-off), AFM, porosity, contact angle and SEM analyses and tested for filtration performances by using a model dye solution (reactive orange 16-RO16) and a real dye-bath textile wastewater. The pore size and density onto the membrane surface become smaller and the surface roughness, porosity, permeability and MWCO values of membranes considerably decreased with the increasing of evaporation temperature. At the pretreatment filtration experiments, the flux values of membranes decreased largely with the increase of the evaporation temperature while the removal efficiencies for color, COD and conductivity parameters increased. At the membrane fouling analysis, the flux reduction ratios (FRR), the filtration (R-t) and fouling (R-f) resistances and the reusable performances of membrane changed directly proportional with roughness, porosity and pore size characteristics of membranes. At the nanofiltration step (NF-270 membrane), the moderate color, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and conductivity removal were showed at permeate of PS-65 membrane (the membrane fabricated at 65 +/- 0.6 degrees C). (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据