4.2 Article

Incidence and risk factors of sepsismortality in labor, delivery and after birth: Population-based study in the USA

期刊

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 8, 页码 1201-1206

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jog.12710

关键词

maternal mortality; obstetric delivery; obstetric labor; post-partum; sepsis

资金

  1. Jewish General Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Maternal sepsis is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality around the world. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence and mortality rate of sepsis, and the associated risk factors for their development during pregnancy, labor, delivery and the post-partum period. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study consisting of 5 million births that occurred in the USA. Data were obtained from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) database from 1998 to 2008. Logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for sepsis development and sepsis-related death during admission for delivery. Results: The overall incidence of maternal sepsis was 29.4 per 100 000 births (95% CI: 28.0-30.9) with a sepsis case fatality rate of 4.4 per 100 births (95% CI: 3.5-5.6). Both the incidence of maternal sepsis and sepsis-related death rate have increased over the last decade. Women who are black, older than 35 years and who smoke were more likely to experience maternal sepsis. An association was also found between maternal sepsis and diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, eclampsia, preterm birth, hysterectomy, puerperal infection, post-partum hemorrhage, transfusion and chorioamnionitis. Conclusions: Mortality from maternal sepsis during labor and delivery is an increasing and important problem in westernized countries. Initiatives aimed at improving early recognition and effective management may help reduce the occurrence and outcomes of maternal sepsis at time of labor and delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据