4.6 Article

RECOGNITION OF IRRATIONALITY OF FEAR AND THE DIAGNOSIS OF SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER AND SPECIFIC PHOBIA IN ADULTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR CRITERIA REVISION IN DSM-5

期刊

DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY
卷 27, 期 11, 页码 1044-1049

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/da.20716

关键词

social anxiety disorder; specific phobia; DSM-5; diagnostic criteria; classification

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [K23 MH085730] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In DSM-IV the diagnosis of social anxiety disorder (SAD) and specific phobia in adults requires that the person recognize that his or her fear of the phobic situation is excessive or unreasonable (criterion C). The DSM-5 Anxiety Disorders Work Group has proposed replacing this criterion because some patients with clinically significant phobic fears do not recognize the irrationality of their fears. In the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services project we determined the number of individuals who were not diagnosed with SAD and specific phobia because they did not recognize the excessiveness or irrationality of their fear. Methods: We interviewed 3,000 psychiatric outpatients and 1,800 candidates for bariatric surgery with a modified version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV In the SAD and specific phobia modules we suspended the skip-out that curtails the modules if criterion C is not met. Patients who met all DSM-IV criteria for SAD or specific phobia except criterion C were considered to have modified SAD or specific phobia. Results: The lifetime rates of DSM-IV SAD and specific phobia were 30.5 and 11.8% in psychiatric patients and 11.7 and 10.2% in bariatric surgery candidates, respectively. Less than 1% of the patients in both samples were diagnosed with modified SAD or specific phobia. Conclusion: Few patients were excluded from a phobia diagnosis because of criterion C. We suggest that in DSM-5 this criterion be eliminated from the SAD and specific phobia criteria sets. Depression and Anxiety 27:1044-1049, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据