4.6 Article

Mapping camphorquinone consumption, conversion and mechanical properties in methacrylates with systematically varied CQ/amine compositions

期刊

DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 1274-1279

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.379

关键词

Methacrylates; Camphorquinone; Amine; Degree of conversion; Photopolymerization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. To evaluate conversion, bulk mechanical properties and camphorquinone (CQ) consumption in methacrylate resins, comprising a range of overall initiator concentrations and CQ/amine ratios. Methods. BisGMA (Bisphenol-A glycidyl dimethacrylate), TEGDMA (triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate) and UDMA (urethane dimethacrylate) were mixed at a 1:1:1 molar ratio. CQ was used as the visible light photosensitizer, in combination with EDMAB (Ethyl pdimethylamino benzoate), at 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3 weight ratios, at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 wt% overall initiator concentration. Butylhydroxytoluene was added at 0.05 wt% as aninhibitor. Unfilled resins were photoactivated with a dental light source (VIP Jr, Bisco) for 60 s at 600 mW/cm(2). Flexural strength/modulus were assessed in 2 x 1 x 10 mm bars, tested in three-point bending. Degree of conversion was assessed at the bottom of the same specimens using FT-RAMAN. CQ consumption was measured using a UV-vis spectrometer. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA/Tukey test (alpha = 5%). Results. Lower conversion and inferior mechanical properties were observed with lower overall initiator concentrations and higher amine/CQ ratios. The lowest overall initiator concentration (0.5%) presented the statistically lowest conversion/properties results, except for the 1: 3 amine/CQ ratio. For overall concentrations equal or greater to 1.5%, the amine/CQ ratio did not influence conversion or mechanical properties. CQ consumption was less efficient for the highest overall initiator concentrations and lower amine/CQ ratios. (C) 2014 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据