4.6 Article

Cytotoxicity of polymerized resin cements on human dental pulp cells in vitro

期刊

DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 1371-1375

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.008

关键词

Polymerize; Resin cement; Cytotoxicity; Pulp cells; Elution; MTT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. This study was designed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of several resin-based cements (Panavia F, Super-Bond C&B, Chemiace II) after polymerization on cultured human dental pulp cells. Methods. After polymerization, specimens from three resin-based cements were eluted with fresh Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) without serum for 72 h, at 37 degrees C, using 0.4g of each substance per milliliter of fresh medium. Elutes obtained during this step were passed through a 0.22-mu m filter and diluted with the culture medium by a ratio of 75%, 50%, 25% (v/v). Cytotoxicity of elutes were evaluated by the relative growth rates (RGR) of pulp cells with a modified 3-(4, 5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The RGR of pulp cells were statistic analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance among the groups. Results. The RGR of cells exposed to 100% concentration of elution of Panavia F, Super-Bond C&B, and Chemiace II were 74.42%, 85.54%, and 82.39%, respectively. The RGR increased along with the elution of cements diluted. There was significant difference between the Panavia F group and Super-Bond C&B group (p < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in the cytotoxicity between Chemiace II and Super-Bond C&B. Conclusions. After polymerization, three resin-based cements (Panavia F, Super-Bond C&B, Chemiace II) induced slight cytotoxicity. The sensitivity of cytotoxicity to human pulp cells depended on the resin-based cements and the concentration of the elution. Super-Bond C&B is the least cytotoxic agent among the three resin-based cements. (C) 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据