4.2 Article

APOE epsilon 2 Allele Is Associated with Larger Regional Cortical Thicknesses and Volumes

期刊

DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 229-237

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000320136

关键词

Aging brain; Mild cognitive impairment; Alzheimer's disease; MR imaging; Apolipoprotein E genotype

资金

  1. EU [LSHB-CT-2005-518170]
  2. Health Research Council of the Academy of Finland [121038]
  3. Kuopio University Hospital [5772720]
  4. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London
  5. Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London
  6. Alzheimers Research UK [ART-RF2007-3] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The protective effect of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon 2 allele against Alzheimer's disease (AD) is controversial. Objective: Our purpose was to clarify if the epsilon 2 allele affects regional cortical thicknesses and volumes. Methods: Regional cortical thicknesses and volumes were measured with an automated pipeline in 109 subjects with mild cognitive impairment, 114 AD patients and 105 age-matched healthy controls. Results: In the mild cognitive impairment group, the epsilon 2 carriers had thicker regional cortices at the transverse temporal cortex and parahippocampal gyrus than the subjects with epsilon 3/epsilon 3, and a larger cerebral gray matter and smaller lateral ventricles than the epsilon 3/epsilon 3 and epsilon 4 carriers. In the AD group, the epsilon 2 carriers had significantly thicker entorhinal and transverse temporal cortices, a larger whole cerebral gray matter, and smaller lateral ventricles than the subjects with the epsilon 3/epsilon 3 genotype, and a significantly thicker entorhinal cortex and larger cerebral gray matter than epsilon 4 carriers. No APOE2 effect was found in the control group. Conclusion: The APOE epsilon 2 allele is associated with larger regional cortical thicknesses and volumes in mild cognitive impairment and AD. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据