4.4 Article

Abundance, feeding and reproduction of Calanus finmarchicus in the Irminger Sea and on the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge in June

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.09.008

关键词

Calanus; egg production; gut fluorescence; vertical distribution; Mid-Atlantic Ridge; Irminger Sea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurements of hydrography, chlorophyll a, abundance, egg production rates and gut fluorescence of Calanus finmarchicus were made on the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge, along a nortb-south transect extending from Iceland to the Azores (similar to 60-44 degrees N, 25-35 degrees W) in June 2004. In addition, similar data were sampled in the Irminger Sea and on the Reykjanes Ridge in June 2003. The results show marked differences in abundance, phytoplankton ingestion rates and egg production rates from north to south. C. finmarchicus was most abundant in the central Irminger Sea (similar to 80,000-160,000 individuals m(-2), 0-100 m), with abundance declining drastically (<20,000 individuals m) south of similar to 58 degrees N. By far, the majority of the animals resided in the upper 100 m(-2) of the water column. Egg production rates were generally the highest near the continental shelf slopes in the western and northeastern parts of the Irminger Sea and in slope waters south of Greenland (similar to 40-60 eggs female(-1) d(-1)). A trend of increasing egg production near the frontal area of the Charlie-Gibbs Fracture Zone also was observed. Phytoplankton ingestion rates, as based on gut fluorescence analysis, were the greatest in the northern Irminger Sea and in slope waters south of Greenland (similar to 8-28 mu g C female d(-1)). The relationships between egg production rates and ingestion rates on the one hand and egg production rates and chlorophyll a concentrations on the other were described by Ivlev curves. The possible causes for the observed spatial variability in abundance and productivity of C finmarchicus are discussed. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据