4.7 Article

Scandium versus yttrium{amino-alkoxy-bis-(phenolate)} complexes for the stereoselective ring-opening polymerization of racemic lactide and β-butyrolactone

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 43, 期 38, 页码 14322-14333

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4dt01206b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  2. CNRS
  3. CAPES-COFE-CUB [Ph556-07_2007-2010]
  4. CAPES-CNRS [PICS05923]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scandium and yttrium amide complexes Ln{ONXOR1,R2}(N(SiHMe2)(2))(THF)(n) (Ln = Sc, n = 0 or Y, n = 1; X = NMe2 or OMe; R-1 = Cumyl or p-Cl-Cumyl; R-2 = Me or Cumyl) were prepared by aminolysis of Ln[N(SiHMe2)(2)](3)(THF) with the corresponding tetradentate diamino-or alkoxy-amino-bis(phenol) pro-ligands {ONXOR1,R2}H-2. In the solid state and in toluene solution, the scandium complexes are monomeric and 5-coordinated, while the analogous yttrium complexes all bear an extra THF-coordinated molecule and are 6-coordinated. Sc{ONXOR1,R2}(N(SiHMe2)(2)) complexes are single-site initiators for the ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of racemic lactide but are less active than their yttrium analogues Y{ONXOR1,R2}-(N(SiHMe2)(2))(THF); also, in contrast to the latter ones, they are inactive in the ROP of the more demanding racemic beta-butyrolactone. On the other hand, the scandium amide complexes feature a significantly improved control over the ROP of lactide, yielding PLAs with much narrower molecular weight distributions (D-M < 1.1 for Sc vs. 1.5-2.0 for Y). The yttrium complex with the very bulky o, p-dicumyl-substituted ligand is more heteroselective than its scandium analogue (P-r = 0.88 vs. 0.83), while the opposite is observed with complexes based on p-methyl-substituted ligands (P-r = 0.50 in toluene or 0.72-0.75 in THF for Y vs. P-r = 0.75-0.83 for Sc in toluene). These reactivity and selectivity trends are rationalized by a much more sterically crowded coordination sphere in scandium than in yttrium complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据