4.7 Article

Designed synthesis of CO2-promoted copper(II) coordination polymers: synthesis, structural and spectroscopic characterization, and studies of versatile functional properties

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 43, 期 36, 页码 13500-13508

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4dt00183d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India [SB/FT/CS-003/2012, GAP-183112]
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of Spain [CTQ2012-30662]
  3. Comissio Interdepartamental de Recercai Innovacio Tecnologica of la Generalitat de Catalunya (CIRIT) [2009-5GR1454]
  4. CSIR-CMERI institutional project [OLP-182112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of CO2-promoted Cu(II) coordination polymers in different coordination environments has been synthesized. The molecular description and properties of the four complexes have been investigated by CHN, MS, UV-VIS, IR, PXRD, TEM, SQUID, SC-XRD, NLDFT, and electrical property characterizations. Single crystal X-ray structure determination of [Cu(bpy)(C2O4)](n) (1) and [Cu(2-AMP)(2)(C2O4)](n) (2) depicts their polynuclearity [bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, 2-AMP = 2-aminopyridine; 2-AMP is a cleaved ligand of starting ligand L-1 = N-(phenyl(pyridin-2-ylamino)methyl)pyridin-2-amine]. Both complexes have distorted octahedral geometry. Starting from another tripodal ligand L-2 [L-2 =2-((((2-(pyridin-2-yl)ethyl)(pyridin-2-yl)-methy)amino)methyl)phenol, L-2' (cleaved L-2 ligand) = 2-( pyridin-2-yl)-N-((pyridin-2-yl)methy)ethan-amine], a mononuclear complex [Cu(L-2)(Cl)] (3) has been obtained with a distorted square pyramidal geometry. Potynuclear complexes 1, 2, and 4 are CO2-mediated functional materials that have been produced in benzonitrile solvent medium. Interestingly, complex 4 of cleaved L-2 ligand is a wonderful copper-based functional material with appreciable surface area. Powder XRD and TEM analysis of complex 4 supports its mesoporosity. Moreover, all four complexes can function as semiconductors over a wide temperature range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据