4.7 Article

MOFs constructed with the newly designed imidazole dicarboxylate bearing a 2-position aromatic substituent: hydro(solvo)thermal syntheses, crystal structures and properties

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 42, 期 5, 页码 1715-1725

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2dt31731a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21071127, 20501017, J0830412]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0139]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Education Department [2009A150028, 2011A150029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Six metal-organic frameworks, namely, [Cd(mu(2)-HDMPhIDC)(Py)](n) (H3DMPhIDC = 2-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-1H-imidazole-4,5-dicarboxylic acid, Py = pyridine) (1), [Sr(mu(2)-HDMPhIDC)(H2O)](n) (2), {[M1(3)(mu(3)-DMPhIDC)(2)(H2O)(6)]center dot 2H(2)O}(n) (M1 = Zn (3), or Mn (4)), [M2(mu(2)-HDMPhIDC)(H2O)(2)](n) (M2 = Mg (5), or Ca (6)), have been hydro(solvo)thermally synthesized and structurally characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, elemental analyses, X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), thermal analyses and IR spectra. 1 is a meso-compound and displays a 3D non-interpenetrated framework with 1D open channels and [Cd-2(HDMPhIDC)(3)(Py)(2)](4) cages, which are composed of left-and right-handed helices pillared by Cd2+ linkages. Polymer 2 exhibits a sheet structure containing infinite distorted hexagonal rings assembled from adjacent corrugated-shaped polymeric chains. Polymers 3 and 4 are isomorphous with an interesting 3D network containing infinite 1D-hexagonal channels and [M2(2)(DMPhIDC)](6) cages, which have two interpenetrating net topologies. Both polymers 5 and 6 present interesting two-dimensional architectures. In these MOFs, the imidazole dicarboxylate ligand shows the diversity in its coordination modes and strong coordination ability. There exists antiferromagnetic coupling between the Mn(II) ions in 4. Furthermore, the solid-state luminescent properties for polymers 1-3, 5 and 6 have also been discussed in detail.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据