4.7 Article

Bifunctional 3D Cu-MOFs containing glutarates and bipyridyl ligands: selective CO2 sorption and heterogeneous catalysis

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 41, 期 41, 页码 12759-12765

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2dt31427d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Korean Government [R01-2009-0074066, 2011K000675, KRF-2008-331-C00149]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012-0004193]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report bifunctional three-dimensional (3D) Cu-MOFs with high selectivity of CO2 over N-2 and H-2 as well as high catalytic activity for transesterification of esters. The Cu-MOFs containing Cu-2 dinuclear units connected by glutarates and bipyridyl ligands are formulated as [{Cu-2(Glu)(2)(mu-bpa)}center dot(CH3CN)](n) (1) and [{Cu-2(Glu)(2)(mu-bpp)}center dot(C3H6O)](n) (2) (Glu = glutarate, bpa = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane, bpp = 1,3-bis-(4-pyridyl)propane). These two new bifunctional 3D Cu-MOFs possess very similar pore shape with different pore dimensions. Their gas sorption behaviors were investigated by using CO2, N-2 and H-2 at suitable temperatures. Both MOFs exhibited good CO2 selectivity over N-2 and H-2. MOF 1 having a smaller pore dimension exhibited much higher CO2 adsorption enthalpy than MOF 2 having a larger pore dimension. However, MOF 2 exhibited more enhanced CO2 uptake ability than MOF 1. A subtle variation of pore dimension indeed influenced the CO2 uptake ability somewhat significantly especially at higher temperatures such as 273 K and 298 K. Heterogeneous catalytic activities of the MOFs were also investigated in detail. Only MOF 1 appeared to be an efficient, mild, and easily recyclable heterogeneous catalyst for the transesterification of esters and constitutes a promising class of heterogeneous catalysts that allowed reuse without a significant loss of activity through twenty runs with ester.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据