4.7 Article

Infrared spectroscopic and theoretical studies of the OTiF2, OZrF2 and OHfF2 molecules with terminal oxo ligands

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 41, 期 38, 页码 11706-11715

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2dt31223a

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE [DE-SC0001034]
  2. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the catalysis center program
  3. University of Alabama
  4. Argonne National Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The isolated group 4 metal oxydifluoride molecules OMF2 (M = Ti, Zr, Hf) with terminal oxo groups are produced specifically on the spontaneous reactions of metal atoms with OF2 through annealing in solid argon. The product structures and vibrational spectra are characterized using matrix isolation infrared spectroscopy as well as B3LYP density functional and CCSD(T) frequency calculations. OTiF2 is predicted to have a planar structure while both OZrF2 and OHfF2 possess pyramidal structures, all with singlet ground states. Three infrared absorptions are observed for each product molecule, one M-O and two M-F stretching modes, and assignments of these molecules are further supported by the corresponding O-18 shifts. The molecular orbitals of the group 4 OMF2 molecules show triple bond character for the terminal oxo groups, which are also supported by an NBO analysis. These molecular orbitals include a sigma bond (O-2p + T-isd hybrid), a normal electron pair pi bond (O-2p + T-id), and a dative pi bond arising from O lone pair donation to the overlapping Ti d orbital. The M-O bond dissociation energies for OMF2 are comparable to those in the diatomic oxide molecules. The OTiF intermediate is also observed through two slightly lower frequency bond stretching modes, and its yield is increased in complementary TiO + F-2 experiments. Finally, the formation of group 4 OMF2 molecules is highly exothermic due to the weak O-F bonds in OF2 as well as the strong new MO and M-F bonds formed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据