4.1 Review

Regulation of Organization and Function of Microtubules by the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascade During Plant Cytokinesis

期刊

CYTOSKELETON
卷 69, 期 11, 页码 913-918

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cm.21072

关键词

cytokinesis; phragmoplast; microtubule; MAPK; MAPs; MAP65; CDK

资金

  1. Program for the Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences (BRAIN)
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [19060003, 19870024, 21770040]
  3. BRAIN
  4. Chubu University
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21770040, 19870024, 19060003, 23370021] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytokinesis in eukaryotes involves specific arrays of microtubules (MTs), which are known as the central spindle in animals, the anaphase spindle in yeasts, and the phragmoplast in plants. In plants, a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade stimulates the turnover of phragmoplast MTs, which allows the expansion of the phragmoplast that is essential for cytokinesis including the formation of cell plates. A prerequisite for activation of this cascade is the interaction between mitotic kinesin NACK1 in tobacco (HIN-KEL in Arabidopsis) and MAPK kinase kinase NPK1 (ANP1, 2, 3 in Arabidopsis). Other members of this cascade are NQK1 MAPK kinase and NRK1/NTF6 MAPK in tobacco and the respective orthologs in Arabidopsis. All the components in the pathway (designated the NACK-PQR pathway) concentrate at the midzone of the phragmoplast in plant cells during cytokinesis. Downstream MAPKs in both plant species phosphorylate microtubule-associated protein 65 (MAP65). Interestingly, activities of components in the NACK-PQR pathway are downregulated by depolymerization of MTs. In the present review, we summarize current views on the mechanisms involved in activating the kinase cascade, a role of MAP65 phosphorylation by MAPK during cytokinesis, and the feedback mechanism for regulating inactivation of the kinase cascade. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据