4.3 Article

Detection of Site-Specific Glycosylation in Proteins Using Flow Cytometry

期刊

CYTOMETRY PART A
卷 75A, 期 10, 页码 866-873

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20773

关键词

glycoprotein; carbohydrate; glycosylation; inflammation; flow cytometry; leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion; PSGL-1; selectin

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL063014, HL63014, R01 HL063014-08S1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We tested the possibility that we may express unique peptide probes on cell surfaces, and detect site-specific glycosylation on these peptides using flow cytometry. Such development can enhance the application of flow cytometry to detect and quantify post-translational modifications in proteins. To this end, the N-terminal section of the human leukocyte glycoprotein PSGL-1 (P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1) was modified to contain a poly-histidine tag followed by a proteolytic cleavage site. Amino acids preceding the cleavage site have a single O-linked glycosylation site. The recombinant protein called PSGL-1 (HT) was expressed on the surface of two mammalian cell lines, CHO and HL-60, using a lentiviral delivery approach. Results demonstrate that the N-terminal portion of PSGL-1 (HT) can be released from these cells by protease, and the resulting peptide can be readily captured and detected using cytometry-bead assays. Using this strategy, the peptide was immunoprecipitated onto beads bearing mAbs against either the poly-histidine sequence or the human PSGL-1. The carbohydrate epitope associated with the released peptide was detected using HECA-452 and CSLEX-1, monoclonal antibodies that recognize the sialyl Lewis-X epitope. Finally, the peptide released from cells could be separated and enriched using nickel chelate beads. Overall, such an approach that combines recombinant protein expression with flow cytometry may be useful to quantify changes in site-specific glycosylation for basic science and clinical applications. (C) 2009 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据