4.5 Article

Prognostic significance of IL-8-STAT-3 pathway in astrocytomas: Correlation with IL-6, VEGF and microvessel morphometry

期刊

CYTOKINE
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 387-395

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.05.012

关键词

IL-8; STAT-3; IL-6; VEGF; astrocytoma

资金

  1. University of Athens
  2. Greek Ministry of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant astrocytomas are highly vascular neoplasms characterized by a potent angiogenic and immunosuppressive phenotype. Th2-cytokines (IL-6/IL-8) are implicated as major regulators of glioma cell growth and invasiveness. STAT-3, a downstream transducer of cytokine signaling is positively associated with tumor angiogenesis. The present study aimed to investigate the expression of IL-8 and p-STAT-3 in 97 diffusely infiltrating astrocytomas of various grades, in relation to IL-6, VEGF, clinicopathological features, microvascular characteristics and patients' survival. IL-8 expression was localized in neoplastic cells, being associated with p-STAT-3 (p = 0.0013), IL-6 (p = 0.0004) and VEGF (p < 0.0001) around areas of necrosis as well as in perivascular inflammatory and endothelial cells. All the molecules under study correlated with tumor grade and degree of necrosis (p < 0.05, respectively). p-STAT-3, IL-8 and VEGF expression was positively associated with microvessel density (p = 0.0491, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0118, respectively). Univariate analysis indicated that overexpression of IL-8 and IL-6 adversely affected survival in the entire cohort whereas increased p-STAT-3 expression was predictive of improved survival in high grade (III/IV) astrocytomas (p = 0.0032). In multivariate analysis only IL-8 expression (p = 0.043) retained its significance. The prognostic significance of IL-8 expression and its correlation with p-STAT-3 and VEGF implicates this novel signaling pathway in astroglial tumors progression providing new targets for effective immunotherapy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据