4.5 Article

Upregulation of TLR2 expression on G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells is responsible for their rapid engraftment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

期刊

CYTOKINE
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 36-42

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.12.020

关键词

G-CS F; Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; Engraftment; TLR2

资金

  1. Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean Government (MOEHRD) [KRF-2008-331-E00067]
  2. MEST [2009 0083956]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are more frequently used as the cellular source in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) than bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) because they promote more rapid engraftment and immune reconstitution. However, the underlying mechanism for this is not fully understood. Here, we investigated the role of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) on PBSCs in promoting rapid engraftment after allogeneic HSCT. We found that PBSCs highly expressed TLR2 in comparison to BMSCs, and TLR2 was directly induced by G-CSF signaling. Treatment with the TLR2 ligand, Pam(3)CSK(4) (PAM), more efficiently induced myeloid differentiation of PBSCs than BMSCs. Similarly, endogenous TLR2 ligands from the serum of recipients of allogeneic transplantation more rapidly stimulated myeloid differentiation of PBSCs compared with BMSCs. PAM treatment of TLR2(-/-) syngeneic recipient mice transplanted with PBSCs resulted in significantly elevated numbers of PBSC-derived myeloid cells and spleen colony formation compared with controls. Our results demonstrate that TLR2 signaling in PBSCs correlates with their ability to rapidly differentiate into myeloid cells, resulting in improved engraftment. Thus, TLR2 may be a novel target for increasing the efficiency of allogeneic HSCT by overcoming engraftment failure or delayed engraftment. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据