4.1 Article

The Chromosomal Distribution of Microsatellite Repeats in the Genome of the Wolf Fish Hoplias malabaricus, Focusing on the Sex Chromosomes

期刊

CYTOGENETIC AND GENOME RESEARCH
卷 132, 期 4, 页码 289-296

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000322058

关键词

Fish sex chromosomes; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Hoplias malabaricus; Microsatellites

资金

  1. Brazilian agencies FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo)
  2. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  3. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)
  4. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [P305/10/0930]
  5. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [AV0Z50040507, AV0Z50040702]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distribution of 12 mono-, di- and tri-nucleotide microsatellites on the chromosomes of 2 karyomorphs with 2 distinct sex chromosome systems (a simple XX/XY - karyomorph B and a multiple X1X1X2X2/X1X2Y - karyomorph D) in Hoplias malabaricus, commonly referred to as wolf fish, was studied using their physical mapping with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The distribution patterns of different microsatellites along the chromosomes varied considerably. Strong hybridization signals were observed at subtelomeric and heterochromatic regions of several autosomes, with a different accumulation on the sex chromosomes. A massive accumulation was found in the heterochromatic region of the X chromosome of karyomorph B, whereas microsatellites were gathered at centromeres of both X chromosomes as well as in corresponding regions of the neo-Y chromosome in karyomorph D. Our findings are likely in agreement with models that predict the accumulation of repetitive DNA sequences in regions with very low recombination. This process is however in contrast with what was observed in multiple systems, where such a reduction might be facilitated by the chromosomal rearrangements that are directly associated with the origin of these systems. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据