4.1 Article

Colocalization of repetitive DNAs and silencing of major rRNA genes. A case report of the fish Astyanax janeiroensis

期刊

CYTOGENETIC AND GENOME RESEARCH
卷 122, 期 1, 页码 67-72

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000151318

关键词

-

资金

  1. FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo) [03/13019-0]
  2. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) [473448/2007-6]
  3. Fundacao Araucaria (Fundacao Araucaria de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico do Estado do Parana)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The heterochromatin composition and location in the genome of the fish Astyanax janeiroensis was investigated using Chromomycin A 3 and DAPI fluorochromes and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with 18S rDNA and As51 satellite DNA probes, respectively. Distinct repetitive DNA classes were found, namely: (1) C-positive centromeric/telomeric heterochromatin, (2) NOR-associated GC-rich heterochromatin (18S(+)/GC(+)) and (3) As 51(+)/18S(+) heterochromatin colocalized on 14 distinct heterochromatic domains with attenuated fluorescence of DAPI staining (As51(+)/18S(+)/DAPI attenuated signal). Besides these fourteen associated repetitive DNAs, another eight sites with only 18S rDNA were also found, comprising altogether 22 18S rDNA sites in the genome of the species under study. Up to seven 18S rDNA sites were found to be active, i.e., were characterized as positive after silver staining (Ag-NORs). It was noteworthy that in all As51(+)/18S(+) domains the 18S rDNA were not found to be active sites due to the silencing of these genes when associated with the As51 satellite DNA in the same heterochromatic domain. The dispersion of the As51 sites in the genome of the species is hypothesized to probably originate from a transposable element. Several chromosomal and karyotype markers are similar between A. janeiroensis and A. scabripinnis, indicating a close relationship between these species. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据