4.5 Article

Inhibition of Amyloid-β Aggregation in Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 1223-1243

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/13816128113199990068

关键词

Amyloid-beta; Amyloid inhibitor; Amyloid toxicity; Protein aggregation; Alzheimer disease

资金

  1. NSF [CBET-0952624, CBET-1158447]
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1158447, 0952624] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The assembly of naturally occurring amyloid peptides into cytotoxic oligomeric and fibrillar aggregates is believed to be a major pathologic event in over 25 human diseases. Blocking of or interfering with the aggregation of amyloid peptides such as amyloid-beta (A beta) using small organic molecules, peptides and peptidomimetics, and nanoparticles that selectively bind or inhibit A beta aggregates is a promising strategy for the development of novel pharmaceutical approaches and agents to treat Alzheimer's disease (AD). In a broad sense, considering many common features in structure, kinetics, and biological activity of amyloid peptides, potent inhibitors and associated inhibition strategies that are developed for targeting A beta aggregation could also be generally applied to other amyloid-forming peptides in protein-aggregation diseases. Due to the complex nature of A beta self-assembly process, increasing knowledge in high-resolution structures of A beta oligomers, atomic-level A beta-inhibitorbinding information, and cost-effective high-throughput screening method will improve our fundamental understanding of amyloid formation and inhibition mechanisms, as well as practical design of pharmaceutical strategies and drugs to treat AD. This review summarizes major findings, recent advances, and future challenges for the development of new A beta-aggregation inhibitors, mainly focusing on three major classes of A beta inhibitors with associated inhibition mechanisms and practical examples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据