4.4 Review

Systemic sclerosis and the heart: current diagnosis and management

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 545-554

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32834b8975

关键词

echocardiography; myocardial fibrosis; myocardial perfusion; natriuretic peptides; systemic sclerosis

资金

  1. American Heart Association [0575041 N, 0835488N]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL107577]
  3. Actelion (Entelligence Award)
  4. Gilead Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review When present clinically, cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a major risk factor for death. It is therefore vitally important to understand the epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment of the cardiac manifestations of SSc. Recent findings The epidemiology of cardiac involvement in SSc has been the subject of several recent studies. Most importantly, the prevalence of overt left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and its associated risk factors have been defined, and patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc appear to be most susceptible to direct cardiac involvement. From a diagnostic and screening standpoint, tissue Doppler echocardiography and natriuretic peptides have provided fresh insight into subclinical cardiac dysfunction in SSc. Newer techniques, such as speckle-tracking echocardiography, diffuse myocardial fibrosis imaging, and absolute myocardial perfusion imaging, are poised to further advance our knowledge. Lastly, there is now consistent observational data to suggest a central role for calcium channel blockers in the treatment of microvascular ischemia and prevention of overt LV systolic dysfunction, although randomized controlled trials are lacking. Summary Recent studies have improved our understanding of cardiac involvement in SSc. Nevertheless, key questions regarding screening, diagnosis, and treatment remain. Novel diagnostic techniques and multicenter studies should yield important new data, which will hopefully ultimately result in improved outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据