4.1 Article

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema in connective tissue disease

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 418-427

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328356803b

关键词

emphysema; pulmonary fibrosis; pulmonary hypertension; rheumatoid arthritis; systemic sclerosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review This review discusses combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) in the setting of connective tissue disease. Recent findings CPFE is a recently identified syndrome in smokers or ex-smokers characterized by dyspnea often severe, preserved lung volumes, severely impaired gas exchanges, and an increased risk of pulmonary hypertension associated with a dismal prognosis, and possibly lung cancer. It may be encountered in the setting of connective tissue diseases, especially rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis, with generally similar features as 'idiopathic' (tobacco-related) CPFE. The diagnosis is based on the presence of both emphysema predominating in the upper lobes and frequently paraseptal, and interstitial abnormalities suggesting pulmonary fibrosis in the lower lung zones with velcro crackles at auscultation. Pathologic radiological correlations are difficult owing to various pathology and difficulties in identifying honeycombing at chest high-resolution computed tomography in the setting of coexistent emphysema. Tobacco smoking is associated with an increased risk of developing most of the individual components of the syndrome (i.e. emphysema, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, and pulmonary fibrosis among patients with rheumatoid arthritis). CPFE impacts modalities of follow-up for pulmonary function and detection of pulmonary hypertension especially in systemic sclerosis. Summary The syndrome of CPFE is a distinct pulmonary manifestation in the spectrum of lung diseases associated with connective tissue diseases, especially in smokers or ex-smokers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据