4.2 Review

Role of NPT2b in health and chronic kidney disease

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.mnh.0000447015.44099.5f

关键词

chronic kidney disease; hyperphosphatemia; intestine; Npt2b

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Maintaining phosphate homeostasis is essential and any deviation can lead to several acute and chronic disease states. To maintain normal physiological levels, phosphate needs to be tightly regulated. This is achieved through a complex relationship of organ cross-talk via hormonal regulation of the type II sodium-dependent phosphate co-transporters. This editorial provides evidence of the importance of intestinal NPT2b in health and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recent findings The advent of the different Npt2b knockout mice has increased our understanding of how the intestinal phosphate co-transporter contributes to the regulation of systemic phosphate. In addition, these studies have suggested that Npt2b may participate in the phosphate-sensing machinery important for organ cross-talk. Studies using Drosophila have expanded our knowledge of phosphate sensing mechanisms and may provide a foundation for delineating these pathways in humans. Several preclinical studies using different agents to modulate Npt2b, and clinical studies using nicotinamide, have provided evidence that Npt2b is a viable therapeutic target for the management of hyperphosphatemia. Summary Over the last couple of years, new experimental approaches have increased our understanding of the important role of Npt2b in maintaining phosphate homeostasis. In addition, several clinical studies have associated the detrimental effects of elevated phosphate with cardiovascular events, and decreased lifespan. Although several key questions about intestinal phosphate transport remain to be answered, it is clear that the intestine is an important player, with current evidence suggesting that it is a prime target for regulating phosphate uptake and improving health outcomes in CKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据