4.2 Review

Therapeutic targets in focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32830464f4

关键词

apoptosis; cell cycle; glomerular basement membrane; glomerular endothelial cells; podocyte; slit diaphragm

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [K12 HD043494] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK074748, R01 DK074748-03] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis occurs due to a defect in the glomerular filtration barrier. This review highlights contributions from the past year that have enhanced our understanding of the pathophysiology of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis with emphasis on discoveries which may lead to the identification of therapeutic targets. Recent findings Slit diaphragm proteins have become increasingly important in signal transduction and in mediating downstream events. Actin polymerization occurs after the podocin-nephrin-Neph-1 complex is phosphorylated by Src kinase and Fyn. Recent studies of angiotensin receptor antagonists, corticosteroids and erythropoietin unravel new mechanisms that ameliorate proteinuria by targeting the cell cycle within the podocyte. The discovery that an N-acetylmannosamine kinase (MNK) mutant mouse has glomerulopathy is suggestive that human sialylation pathways may represent therapeutic targets. Proteinuria before podocyte effacement demonstrated in laminin-beta 2 null mice highlights the importance of the glomerular basement membrane. Interferon-beta reduced proteinuria in three models of kidney injury, showing greatest effect on glomerular endothelial cells in vitro. Summary Basic research has illuminated mechanisms by which classic therapies have antiproteinuric effects directly on the podocyte. As knowledge expands with improved molecular techniques, understanding signaling pathways in health and proteinuric states should lead to potential therapeutic targets in focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据