4.1 Review

Important clinical advances in the understanding of Clostridium difficile infection

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 42-48

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32835a68d4

关键词

acid suppression therapy; Clostridium difficile; fecal microbiota transplantation; fidaxomicin; molecular diagnostics

资金

  1. Hines VA Hospital
  2. US Department of Veterans Affairs Research Service [I01 BX000121]
  3. Merck
  4. Actelion
  5. Cubist

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Clostridium difficile remains an important cause of infectious colitis, particularly in healthcare facilities. This review summarizes recent advances in the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of this endemic pathogen. Recent findings C. difficile infection (CDI) hospitalizations and mortality rates have increased over the last decade. The BI/NAP1/027 strain has been responsible for epidemics with increased severity and mortality and is now endemic in many settings, particularly North America. Concurrent antibiotics have now been shown to decrease the cure rates for anti-C. difficile therapy and increase the risk of recurrence. Although studies implicate proton pump inhibitors as a risk for CDI, the magnitude of and the biological basis for that risk remain unclear. Molecular diagnostic techniques are rapid and sensitive but highlight the importance of using appropriate clinical testing criteria. Fidaxomicin is a promising new therapy associated with decreased recurrence; infections due to BI strains, however, are associated with inferior outcomes regardless of the treatment agent. Fecal transplantation continues to have impressive success rates for patients with recurrent CDI, and a new colon-sparing surgical procedure presents an intriguing suggested alternative to total colectomy in severe, complicated cases. Summary Elucidating CDI risk factors, identifying rapid, accurate diagnostic tools, and validating new treatment approaches remains an urgent priority.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据