4.2 Review

Nutritional potential of metabolic remodelling of white adipose tissue

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328365980f

关键词

early life nutrition; metabolic programming; obesity; white adipose tissue browning

资金

  1. European Union [244995, 278373]
  2. Spanish Government [AGL2012-33692]
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutricion, CIBERobn
  4. European Nutrigenomics Organization, EU) [n8FP6-506360]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of reviewRecent findings in animals suggest that diet-related factors can programme adipose tissue features in early life and remodel white adipose tissue (WAT) towards a brown adipose tissue (BAT)-like phenotype in adulthood, while impacting on body fat content and susceptibility to obesity. The purpose of this review is to address the significance of these results and their applicability in humans.Recent findingsNutritional conditions in the perinatal period influence sympathetic innervation to WAT and WAT cellularity in rodents. Leptin intake during the suckling period prevents obesity and other metabolic alterations in later life in rats through mechanisms that include increased sensitivity of adipose tissues to leptin. Recent data support the thermogenic functionality of inducible brown-like cells in rodent WAT and functional thermogenic beige adipogenesis from human progenitor cells. Diet-related factors and exercise can promote BAT activation and/or WAT-to-BAT remodelling (WAT browning) in animals.SummaryAnimal studies suggest that adipose tissue health and whole body adiposity might be influenced by early life nutrition and lifestyle factors in adulthood impacting energy metabolism in adipose tissues. For this knowledge to be translated to humans, biomarkers allowing early detection of the programming status of the individual and technologies allowing measuring of the thermogenic activity of adipose tissue depots in vivo are required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据