4.4 Article

Abundance and Diversity of Ammonia-Oxidizing Microorganisms in the Sediments of Jinshan Lake

期刊

CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY
卷 69, 期 5, 页码 751-757

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00284-014-0646-0

关键词

Ammonia-oxidizing archaea; Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria; Freshwater lake; amoA; qPCR

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51109097]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK2011520]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012T50464]
  4. Research and Innovation Project for College Graduate of Jiangsu Province [1223000281]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Community structures of ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms were investigated using PCR primers designed to specifically target the ammonia monooxygenase a-subunit (amoA) gene in the sediment of Jinshan Lake. Relationships between the abundance and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), and physicochemical parameters were also explored. The AOA abundance decreased sharply from west to east; however, the AOB abundance changed slightly with AOB outnumbering AOA in two of the four sediment samples (JS), JS3 and JS4. The AOA abundance was significantly correlated with the NH4-N, NO3-N, and TP. No significant correlations were observed between the AOB abundance and environmental variables. AOB had a higher diversity and richness of amoA genes than AOA. Among the 76 archaeal amoA sequences retrieved, 57.89, 38.16, and 3.95 % fell within the Nitrosopumilus, Nitrososphaera, and Nitrososphaera sister clusters, respectively. The 130 bacterial amoA gene sequences obtained in this study were grouped with known AOB sequences in the Nitrosomonas and Nitrosospira genera, which occupied 72.31 % and 27.69 % of the AOB group, respectively. Compared to the other three sample sites, the AOA and AOB community compositions at JS4 showed a large difference. This work could enhance our understanding of the roles of ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms in freshwater lake environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据