4.3 Article

Real-world comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients

期刊

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 1317-1325

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2014.907140

关键词

Comparison of treatment; Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

资金

  1. Janssen Scientific Affairs LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Rivaroxaban was shown to be effective in reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) in a randomized controlled trial setting. Objective: To assess real-world safety, effectiveness, and persistence associated with rivaroxaban and warfarin in nonvalvular AF patients. Methods: Healthcare claims from Symphony Health Solutions' Patient Transactional Datasets from May 2011 to July 2012 were analyzed. Adult patients newly initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin, with >= 2 AF diagnoses (ICD-9-CM: 427.31) and a CHADS(2) score >= 1 during the 180 day baseline period were included. Cohorts were matched 1: 4 using propensity score methods. Study outcomes were major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, composite stroke and systemic embolism, and venous thromboembolism (VTE) events. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare event and persistence rates. Results: The matched sample included 3654 rivaroxaban and 14,616 warfarin patients. Matching was adequate, with all standardized differences in patient characteristics <10%. No significant differences were observed for bleeding and composite stroke and systemic embolism outcomes, although rivaroxaban users were associated with significantly fewer VTE events (hazard ratio [HR]=0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.54, p<0.0001) compared to warfarin users. Rivaroxaban was also associated with a significantly lower risk of treatment non-persistence (HR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.60-0.72, p<0.0001). Limitations: Claims data may have contained inaccuracies, and mortality and laboratory data were not available. Confounding may still have been possible even after propensity score matching. Early use pattern of medications may have changed over time. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that rivaroxaban and warfarin do not differ significantly in real-world rates of composite stroke and systemic embolism and major, intracranial, or GI bleeding. Rivaroxaban, however, was associated with significantly fewer VTE events and significantly better treatment persistence compared with warfarin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据