4.3 Article

Treatment patterns and symptom control in patients with GERD: US community-based survey

期刊

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 1869-1878

出版社

LIBRAPHARM/INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.1185/03007990903035745

关键词

Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Proton pump inhibitor; Symptom control

资金

  1. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most commonly used pharmacological treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Objective: To examine the utilization patterns of PPIs and other GERD-related medications, satisfaction with PPI treatment and presence of GERD symptoms. Patients and methods: GERD patients using prescription PPIs were identified from a mixed-model HMO health plan. Utilization patterns of PPIs and other GERD medications, satisfaction with PPI treatment and presence of GERD symptoms were assessed using questionnaires. Results: Among the 617 patients who completed the survey, 71.0% used PPIs once a day (QD), 22.2% used twice a day (BID) and 6.8% more than twice a day or on an as-needed basis. Approximately 42.1% of all patients supplemented their prescription PPIs with other GERD medications, including over-the-counter medications and H(2)-receptor antagonists. Over 85% of the patients still experienced GERD symptoms and 82.7% nighttime symptoms. Overall, 72.8% of all patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their PPI treatment. Limitations: The study used self-reported data which may have been subject to recall bias. As the study was conducted in a specific region of the US, the results may have limited generalizability to other US regions or countries. Conclusions: Patients on PPI treatment often experience GERD symptoms and supplement their prescription PPIs with other GERD medications. A substantial proportion of GERD patients receiving PPI treatment are on a BID regimen. Furthermore, more than a quarter of the patients are not completely satisfied with their PPI treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据