4.2 Article

Lack of the catalytic subunit of telomerase leads to growth defects accompanied by structural changes at the chromosomal ends in Yarrowia lipolytica

期刊

CURRENT GENETICS
卷 56, 期 5, 页码 413-425

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00294-010-0310-6

关键词

Telomere; Telomerase; Est2; Yarrowia lipolytica; Telomerase-independent telomere maintenance

资金

  1. Fogarty International Research Collaboration Award [2-R03-TW005654-04A1]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute [55005622]
  3. APVT [20-001604, 0024-07]
  4. VEGA [1/0132/09, 1/0219/08]
  5. Comenius University [UK/234/2006, UK/250/2007, UK/198/2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comparative analysis of the telomeres of distantly related species has proven to be helpful for identifying novel components involved in telomere maintenance. We therefore initiated such a study in the nonconventional yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Its genome encodes only a small fraction of the proteins that are typically associated with telomeres in other yeast models, indicating that its telomeres may employ noncanonical means for their stabilization and maintenance. In this report, we have measured the size of the telomeric fragments in wild-type strains, and characterized the catalytic subunit of telomerase (YlEst2p). In silico analysis of the YlEst2 amino acid sequence revealed the presence of domains typical for telomerase reverse transcriptases. Disruption of YlEST2 is not lethal, but results in retarded growth accompanied by a rapid loss of the telomeric sequences. This phenotype is associated with structural changes at the chromosomal ends in the Delta Ylest2 mutants, likely the circularization of all six chromosomes. An apparent absence of several typical telomere-associated factors, as well as the presence of an efficient means of telomerase-independent telomere maintenance, qualify Y. lipolytica as an attractive model for the study of telomere maintenance mechanisms and a promising source of novel players in telomere dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据