4.4 Article

HDL: To Treat or Not To Treat?

期刊

CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

CURRENT MEDICINE GROUP
DOI: 10.1007/s11883-014-0429-x

关键词

High-density lipoprotein; Residual cardiovascular risk; Mendelian randomization; HDL-raising drugs; HDL quality; HDL quantity

资金

  1. Genzyme
  2. Merck
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Angen
  5. Aegerion
  6. Eli-Lilly
  7. Mediolanum
  8. Sanofi
  9. Rottapharm
  10. Recordati

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several studies have shown an inverse relationship between HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and the risk of cardiovascular disease. Low HDL-C levels are commonly present in subjects with diabetes, metabolic syndrome, or obesity. These observations have suggested that increasing HDL concentrations might help in decreasing the cardiovascular disease risk. However, despite initial positive results, some recent data from clinical trials with HDL-raising therapies failed to confirm this hypothesis; in addition, data from Mendelian randomization analyses showed that nucleotide polymorphisms associated with increased HDL-C levels did not decrease the risk of myocardial infarction, further challenging the concept that higher HDL-C levels will automatically translate into lower cardiovascular disease risk. Differences in the quality and distribution of HDL particles might partly explain these findings, and in agreement with this hypothesis, some observations have suggested that HDL subpopulation levels may be better predictors of cardiovascular disease than simple HDL-C levels. Thus, it is expected that increased-HDL-C levels may be beneficial when associated with an improvement in HDL function, suggesting that pharmacological approaches able to correct or increase HDL functions might produce more reliable clinical benefits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据