4.2 Article

Properties of CA3 Dendritic Excrescences in Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

CURRENT ALZHEIMER RESEARCH
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 84-90

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/156720510790274482

关键词

Branched spines; excrescences; giant spines; Golgi study; hippocampus; CA3 area; limbic system; Alzheimer's disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CA3 pyramidal neurons and hilar mossy neurons possess large and branched dendritic spines, named thorny excrescences. Studies on experimental animals have shown great morphologic adaptation of the excrescences and the whole dendritic tree of CA3 pyramidal neurons in changes of environmental conditions. However, the available data about the excrescences in human brain is short and insufficient about their properties in Alzheimer's disease. In the present study, these dendritic structures were studied and compared in CA3 area of hippocampus in patients suffered from Alzheimer's disease, age matched controls and young individuals. Golgi impregnated material under light microscopy was used for the description of the structural characteristics of the excrescences. Morphometric estimation of their density on the apical and basilar dendritic tree and their average length revealed reduced density and significantly increased size in Alzheimer's disease patients. The mean density of the excrescences on the apical dendritic tree of the patients compared to age matched controls is reduced 32.8% (p < 0.001), while the mean number of long excrescences (longer than 5 mu m) is increased 32.6% (p < 0.05). On the basilar dendritic tree, the reduction in density is 26.3% (p < 0.05) and the increase in the number of long excrescences is 23.3% (p < 0.05). These enlarged thorny excrescences can be even longer than 10 mu m, appearing as giant spines. The increased size of the excrescences is considered as a remodeling procedure (compensative mechanism) of the CA3 pyramidal neurons for the balancing of the reduction in the spinal density.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据