4.7 Article

Solvents influence on sizes of channels in three fry topological Mn(II)-MOFs based on metal-carboxylate chains: syntheses, structures and magnetic properties

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 15, 期 40, 页码 8125-8132

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ce41120f

关键词

-

资金

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [20931005]
  2. Key Research Planning Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [91022004]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21001088, 21201139]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three new 3D Mn(II)-MOFs have been synthesized via solvothermal reaction with MnCl2 center dot 4H(2)O and [1,1': 4',1 ''-terphenyl]-2',4,4 '',5'-tetracarboxylic acid (H(4)tptc) in three different solvents [N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF)], namely, [Mn-2(tptc)(H2O)(NMP)]center dot NMP (1), [Mn-2(tptc)(H2O)(DMA)]center dot DMA (2) and Mn-2(tptc)(DMF)(2) (3), all of which were fully characterized. In 1 and 2, the 1D uniform Mn-carboxylate chains with the (mu-EO-H2O/NMP/DMA)(mu-COO)(2) triple bridges (EO = end-on) are extended by the tptc linkers to form a 3D (3,4)-connected fry net with 1D irregular quadrangular channels. Interestingly, 3 possess two kinds of Mn-carboxylate chains and can also be simplified as a fry net. The self-assembly synthesis system responds to small carbonyl solvents (NMP, DMA and DMF) with very high sensitivity and selectivity, but products using hydroxy solvents (methanol, alcohol and isopropanol) were not identified. The various pore frameworks of 1-3 are filled by different coordinated and latticed solvent molecules in their channels. The sizes of the channels [3 (33.11 angstrom(2)) < 2 (35.17 angstrom(2)) < 1 (35.37 angstrom(2))] are induced by the sizes of the solvent molecules (DMF < DMA < NMP). The good chemical stabilities of 1-3 were observed. Magnetic studies demonstrate that the magnetic coupling through the mixed carboxylate bridges in all compounds is antiferromagnetic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据