4.7 Article

Ligand geometry-driven formation of different coordination polymers from Zn(NO3)(2), 1,4-bpeb and phenylenediacetic acids

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 1851-1857

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0ce00575d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20871088, 90922018]
  2. Nature Science Key Basic Research of Jiangsu Province for Higher Education [09KJA150002]
  3. Ministry of Education [20093201110017]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry of Nanjing University
  5. Qin-Lan Project of Jiangsu Province
  6. 333 Project of Jiangsu Province
  7. Suzhou University
  8. Innovative Research Program for Postgraduates in Universities of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hydrothermal reactions of Zn(NO3)(2)center dot 6H(2)O with 1,4-bis[2-(4-pyridyl)ethenyl]benzene (1,4-bpeb), NaOH, and 1,4-phenylenediacetic acid (1,4-H(2)PDA), 1,3-phenylenediacetic acid (1,3-H(2)PDA) or 1,2-phenylenediacetic acid (1,2-H(2)PDA) afforded three coordination polymers {[Zn(1,4-PDA)(1,4-bpeb)]center dot 2H(2)O}(n) (1), [Zn(1,3-PDA)(1,4-bpeb)](n) (2) and [Zn-4(mu-OH)(2)(1,2-PDA)(3)(1,4-bpeb)(2)](n) (3), respectively. All these compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, IR, powder X-ray diffraction, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. 1 exhibits a five-fold interpenetrating 3D diamondoid framework constructed by linking Zn atoms with trans-1,4-PDA and trans-trans-trans-1,4-bpeb ligands. 2 has a 2D (4,4) network formed by connecting dinuclear [Zn-2(1,3-PDA)(2)] (1,3-PDA serving as a trans conformation) units with trans-cis-trans-1,4-bpeb ligands. 3 could be considered as a 2D 5-connected network derived from linking tetranuclear [Zn-4(mu-OH)(2)(1,2-PDA)(3)] (1,2-PDA acting as cis and trans conformations) units via trans-cis-trans-1,4-bpeb bridges. The results provided some insight into the ligand geometry-driven assembly of coordination polymers. Thermal stability and photoluminescent properties of 1-3 were also investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据