4.6 Article

Sleep quality in mechanically ventilated patients: Comparison of three ventilatory modes

期刊

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 1749-1755

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181743f41

关键词

mechanical ventilation; sleep; ventilatory mode; polysomnography; pressure support ventilation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To compare the influence of three ventilatory modes on sleep. Design: Prospective, comparative, crossover study. Setting: Medical intensive care unit in a university hospital. Patients: Fifteen conscious, nonsedated, mechanically ventilated patients. Interventions: Patients were successively ventilated with assist-control ventilation, clinically adjusted pressure support ventilation (cPSV), and automatically adjusted pressure support ventilation (aPSV). Sleep polysomnography was performed during three consecutive 6-hr periods, one with each mode in random order. Airway pressure and thorax and abdomen plethysmography were used to diagnose central apneas and ineffective efforts. Measurements and Main Results: The main abnormalities were a low percentage of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep counting, for a median (25th-75th percentiles) of 10% (3.5-12.5) of total sleep, and a highly fragmented sleep with 29 arousals and awak-enings per hour of sleep. REM sleep duration was similar in the three ventilatory modes, 7% in assist-control, 4% in aPSV, and 1% during cPSV (p =.54), as well as in the fragmentation index, 31 arousals and awakenings per hour in assist-control, 32 in aPSV, and 34 during cPSV (p =.62). Ineffective efforts occurred similarly with the three modes (seven per hour of sleep in assist-control, 16 in aPSV, and 12 during cPSV) or central apneas during PSV (five in aPSV, seven during cPSV). Minute ventilation was similar with the three modes. Conclusions: In conscious, mechanically ventilated patients, sleep architecture was highly abnormal, with a short REM stage and a high degree of fragmentation. The ventilatory mode did not influence sleep pattern, arousals, awakenings, and ineffective efforts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据