4.1 Article

The PAADRN Study: A design for a randomized controlled practical clinical trial to improve bone health

期刊

CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 90-100

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.10.002

关键词

Osteoporosis; DXA scan; Patient education; Fracture; Letter; Medication adherence

资金

  1. Amgen
  2. Eli Lilly
  3. Merck
  4. Novartis
  5. NIAMS [AR062133]
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs
  7. NIA at the NIH [R01 AG033035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: To describe the rationale and design of an NIH funded randomized controlled trial: the Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) study. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the effect that a direct mailing of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) results from bone density testing centers to patients will have on patients' knowledge, treatment and self-efficacy. Methods: We will enroll approximately 7500 patients presenting for DXA at three study sites, the University of Iowa, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Kaiser Permanente of Atlanta, Georgia. We will randomize providers (and their respective patients) to either the intervention arm or usual care. Patients randomized to the intervention group will receive a letter with their DXA results and an educational brochure, while those randomized to usual care will receive their DXA results according to standard practice. The seven discrete outcomes are changes from baseline to 12-weeks and/or 52-weeks post-DXA in: (1) guideline concordant pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapy; (2) knowledge of DXA results; (3) osteoporosis-specific knowledge; (4) general health-related quality of life; (5) satisfaction with bone-related health care, (6) patient activation; and, (7) osteoporosis-specific self-efficacy. Conclusion: This trial will offer evidence of the impact of a novel approach-direct-to-patient mailing of test results-to improve patient activation in their bone health care. The results will inform clinical practice for the communication of DXA and other test results. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据