4.7 Article

Practical model for predicting corrosion rate of steel reinforcement in concrete structures

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 385-401

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.046

关键词

Reinforced concrete; Corrosion rate; Concrete resistivity; Cover thickness; Water-to-cement ratio; Chloride content; Relative humidity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51168003, 51368006]
  2. Technology Foundation for Selected Overseas Chinese Scholar, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of China [2012-258]
  3. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2012GXNSFEA053002, 2013GXNSFBA019237]
  4. Guangxi Science and Technology Development Program [1377001-11]
  5. Research Program of Science and Technology of Guangxi Higher Education [2013YB009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A practical model for predicting the corrosion rate of steel reinforcement in concrete structures was proposed. The numerical model with nonlinear boundary conditions for the macrocell corrosion of steel reinforcement in concrete structures was established based on the electrochemical principles and the Bulter-Volmer equation. The influences of various parameters such as anode-to-cathode (A/C) ratio, relative humidity, concrete resistivity, cover thickness on the corrosion control mode and corrosion rate of steel reinforcement in concrete structures were then investigated. Finally, a practical model for predicting the corrosion rate of steel reinforcement in concrete structures was proposed based on a comprehensive nonlinear regression analysis with easily quantifiable engineering parameters, such as water-to-cement (W/C) ratio, chloride content, thickness of concrete cover and relative humidity. Model comparison and experimental verification demonstrate that the proposed prediction model is of good accuracy and applicability to real life scenarios in terms of capturing the corrosion behavior of steel reinforcement in different situations. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据