4.7 Article

Performance evaluation and preventive measures for aging of different bitumens

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 209-213

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.016

关键词

Bitumen; Anti-aging additive; Thermal aging; Ultraviolet aging; Modification

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2013AA031602]
  2. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011BAE28B04]
  3. Key Program for International Science and Technology Cooperation Projects of Shaanxi province [2012KW-09]
  4. Doctoral Program Foundation of Institutions of Higher Education of China Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120205120010]
  5. Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation [BK2011085]
  6. National Engineering Laboratory for Advanced Road Materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aging performance of bitumen and its preventive measures have attracted more and more attentions all over the world. In this paper, three different bitumens (denoted as A, B and C) were exposed to thermal and ultraviolet (UV) aging at different UV intensities. The physical parameters of bitumens were compared for the selection of bitumen with inferior aging properties. To improve the aging resistance of the selected bitumen, various anti-aging additives were used to modify the bitumen via melt blending. The modified bitumen with excellent aging resistance was obtained through physical properties evaluation and Fourier transform infrared analysis. Results indicate that bitumen A exhibits the best thermal and UV aging resistance, then the bitumen B, and the bitumen C shows the worst thermal and UV aging resistance. Among the anti-aging additives used, antioxidant Irganox1010 shows the best ability to resist both the thermal and UV aging of the selected bitumen C. The selected bitumen C with excellent aging resistance can be prepared with the addition of the Irganox1010 at a proper content of 0.4-0.6%. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据