4.3 Article

Genetic diversity, population genetic structure and demographic history of Przewalski's gazelle (Procapra przewalskii): implications for conservation

期刊

CONSERVATION GENETICS
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 1457-1468

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-011-0244-7

关键词

Genetic diversity; Population genetic structure; Demographic history; Microsatellite loci; Procapra przewalskii; Qinghai-Tibet plateau

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2008BAC39B04]
  2. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [31070469]
  3. SSC/IUCN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Przewalski's gazelle (Procapra przewalskii) is one of the most endangered antelope species in the world. It is endemic to China and is a flagship species in the eastern part of the Qinghai-Tibet plateau. To establish effective conservation measures on this species, genetic information such as genetic structure is needed. However, there has not been a comprehensive genetic assessment on this gazelle using nuclear DNA markers yet. Here, we employed 13 microsatellite loci to investigate genetic diversity, population genetic structure and demographic history of Przewalski's gazelle using noninvasive samples of 169 wild gazelles collected from nine populations. A total of 76 alleles were detected from the entire samples, mean allele number was 5.85, and overall H-O and H-E were 0.525 and 0.552, respectively. Structure and GENELAND analyses found six genetic groups in the nine populations. Between the inferred genetic groups, significant genetic differentiation and low migration rates were detected. Demographic analyses indicated that Przewalski's gazelle experienced genetic bottleneck and severe population decline, with the ancestral effective population size reducing to less than one percent. Based on the results of this study, we provide several conservation recommendations for Przewalski's gazelle, such as six management units, periodic monitoring and special conservation consideration on the Qiejitan population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据