4.3 Article

Comparative survey of within-river genetic structure in Atlantic salmon; relevance for management and conservation

期刊

CONSERVATION GENETICS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 869-879

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-008-9647-5

关键词

Population structure; Genetic divergence; Management; Conservation; Salmon

资金

  1. Ministere des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune du Quebec (MRNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In wild populations, defining the spatial scale at which management and conservation practices should focus remains challenging. In Atlantic salmon, compelling evidence suggests that genetic structure within rivers occurs, casting doubt on the underlying premise of the river-based management approach for this species. However, no comparisons of within-river genetic structure across different systems have been performed yet to assess the generality of this pattern. We compared the within-river genetic structure of four important salmon rivers in North America and evaluated the extent of genetic differentiation among their main tributaries. We found a hierarchical genetic structure at the river and tributary levels in most water systems, except in the Miramichi where panmixia could not be rejected. In the other cases, genetic differentiation between most tributaries was significant and could be as high as that found between rivers of the same geographical region. More importantly, the extent of genetic differentiation between tributaries varied greatly among water systems, from well differentiated (theta(ST) = 0.035) to undifferentiated (theta(ST) = -0.0003), underlying the difficulty in generalizing the ubiquity of within-river genetic structure in Atlantic salmon. Thus, this study underlines the importance of evaluating the genetic structure of Atlantic salmon in large water systems on a case by case basis in order to define the most appropriate spatial scale and focal unit for efficient management and conservation actions. The potential consequences of management at an inappropriate spatial scale are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据