4.4 Article

Computationally unraveling how ceritinib overcomes drug-resistance mutations in ALK-rearranged lung cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-015-2716-z

关键词

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK); Molecular dynamics simulations; Ceritinib; MM-GBSA; Drug resistance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds for Young Scholars of China [31200602, 31200209]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014T70475]
  3. Jiangsu Postdoctoral Science Foundation [1301140c]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), a receptor tyrosine kinase, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several cancers. The small molecule ceritinib can overcome drug-resistance mutations that are observed in crizotinib-resistant patients, although the detailed mechanism for this ability of ceritinib remains elusive. Here, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of six systems (including the apo ALK, the wild-type ALK-ceritinib complex, as well as four complexes of ceritinib with the I1171T, L1196M, S1206Y, and G1269A mutants of ALK, respectively) together with the subsequent molecular mechanics-generalized Born/surface area binding free energy calculations were performed to answer this question. Principal component analysis and domain cross-correlation analysis of MD trajectories revealed that ceritinib binding stabilized the conformational dynamics of both the wild-type and the four mutated ALKs as compared to the apo ALK. Moreover, the mutations had subtle effects on the conformation of ALK compared to that of the wild-type ALK. Importantly, binding free energy calculations demonstrated that, compared its effect on the wild-type ALK, ceritinib showed slightly increased potency towards the I1171T, L1196M, S1206Y, and G1269A mutants. Therefore, the binding of ceritinib to the four mutants can overcome crizotinib-resistant mutations. These data provide a structural and energetic explanation of how ceritinib overcomes mutation-induced drug resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据