4.5 Article

Cardioprotection of recombinant human MG53 protein in a porcine model of ischemia and reperfusion injury

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.12.010

关键词

Myocardial infarction; Cell membrane repair; TRIM72; Myocardial ischemia; Angioplasty

资金

  1. NIH [AR061385, HL069000, AG028614, AR063084]
  2. National Science & Technology Major Project of China
  3. Scientist Development Grant from American Heart Association [12SDG12070174]
  4. SBIR grant [R44AR060019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

lschemic heart disease is a leading cause of death in human population and protection of myocardial infarction (MI) associated with ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) remains a challenge. MG53 is an essential component of the cell membrane repair machinery that protects injury to the myocardium. We investigated the therapeutic value of using the recombinant human MG53 (rhMG53) protein for treatment of MI. Using Langendorff perfusion of isolated mouse heart, we found that I/R caused injury to cardiomyocytes and release of endogenous MG53 into the extracellular solution. rhMG53 protein was applied to the perfusion solution concentrated at injury sites on cardiomyocytes to facilitate cardioprotection. With rodent models of I/R-induced MI, we established the in vivo dosing range for rhMG53 in cardioprotection. Using a porcine model of angioplasty-induced MI, the cardioprotective effect of rhMG53 was evaluated. Intravenous administration of rhMG53, either prior to or post-ischemia, reduced infarct size and troponin I release in the porcine model when examined at 24 h post-reperfusion. Echocardiogram and histological analyses revealed that the protective effects of rhMG53 observed following acute MI led to long-term improvement in cardiac structure and function in the porcine model when examined at 4 weeks post-operation. Our study supports the concept that rhMG53 could have potential therapeutic value for treatment of MI in human patients with ischemic heart diseases. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据