4.6 Article

Process synthesis of hybrid coal, biomass, and natural gas to liquids via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, ZSM-5 catalytic conversion, methanol synthesis, methanol-to-gasoline, and methanol-to-olefins/distillate technologies

期刊

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 29-56

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.032

关键词

Process synthesis with heat, power, and water integration; Hybrid energy systems; Mixed-integer nonlinear optimization; Fischer-Tropsch; Methanol to gasoline; Methanol to olefins and distillate

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF EFRI-0937706]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1158849] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Emerging Frontiers & Multidisciplinary Activities [0937706] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several technologies for synthesis gas (syngas) refining are introduced into a thermochemical based superstructure that will convert biomass, coal, and natural gas to liquid transportation fuels using Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis or methanol synthesis. The FT effluent can be (i) refined into gasoline, diesel, and kerosene or (ii) catalytically converted to gasoline and distillate over a ZSM-5 zeolite. Methanol can be converted using ZSM-5 (i) directly to gasoline or to (ii) distillate via olefin intermediates. A mixed-integer nonlinear optimization model that includes simultaneous heat, power, and water integration is solved to global optimality to determine the process topologies that will produce the liquid fuels at the lowest cost. Twenty-four case studies consisting of different (a) liquid fuel combinations, (b) refinery capacities, and (c) superstructure possibilities are analyzed to identify important process topological differences and their effect on the overall system cost, the process material/energy balances, and the well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据