4.5 Article

Mixed-pattern cracking in silica during stress corrosion: A reactive molecular dynamics simulation

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 237-243

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.045

关键词

Stress corrosion; Silica; Molecular dynamics simulation; Water; First principles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51175503]
  2. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduates [CX2010B014]
  3. Graduate School of NUDT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanism of stress corrosion cracking in silica is poorly understood on the molecular level. We have examined the stress corrosion process of strained alpha-quartz in liquid water using molecular dynamics simulations with ReaxFF, which is a first-principles-based reactive force field. Over the course of 3000 ps, no crack initiation or crack growth was observed in the quartz structure under 23% strain in a dry environment, while significant crack propagations were observed in the quartz under three different and smaller strains (i.e., 17%, 20%, and 22%) in liquid water. The crack velocities for the 17%, 20%, and 22% strains in liquid water were 7.1 m/s, 3.1 m/s, and 0.57 m/s, respectively, which are all larger than the experimental crack velocity of bulk samples. The strain distributions of crack tips indicated that the crack propagates along the direction of maximum strain, and the strain is released after crack propagation. The crack becomes stable when the strain of the quartz is released and becomes approximately zero. The analysis of the chemical species involved in stress corrosion, the depth of the crack tip, and the atomic snapshots indicate that the crack growth is primarily induced by the hydrolysis of strained Si-O bonds located at the crack tip. Mixed-pattern cracking, including stress corrosion cracking and purely stress-induced cracking similar to brittle fracture, occurs when the applied strain increases. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据