4.7 Article

Structure design and performance study on braid-reinforced cellulose acetate hollow fiber membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 486, 期 -, 页码 248-256

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.066

关键词

Cellulose acetate; Braid-reinforced; Hollow fiber membrane; Strength; Interface

资金

  1. National Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB722706]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51073120, 21274109]
  3. Science and Technology Plans of Tianjin [12JCZDJC26600]
  4. Basic Research Program of China National Textile and Apparel Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel braid reinforced (BR) cellulose acetate (CA) hollow fiber membrane consisting of separation layer and 'hybrid' braid was reported in this study. The 'hybrid' braid containing CA and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fiber not only provided the membrane well interfacial bonding state but also overcame the negative effect of CA fiber's swelling on membrane permeability. The influences of braid composition and CA concentration on the structure and performance of BR CA membranes were investigated. There were two kinds of interfaces between the braid and the separation layer, which were named homogeneous-reinforced (HMR) interface and heterogeneous-reinforced (HTR) interface. Taking into account both interfacial bonding state and membrane permeability, the best ratio of the fibers in the braid was 2/1(CA/PAN). Increased CA concentration brought about reduced permeate flux and increased protein rejection. The BR CA membranes exhibited excellent anti-fouling properly with flux recovery rates higher than 80%. The tensile strength of BR CA hollow fiber membranes varied from 16.0 MPa to 62.9 MPa by adjusting the braid composition. The BR CA membrane showed similar performance with the commercial hydrophilic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) hollow fiber membrane during the filtration of milk solution, and the flux could be recovered by chemical cleaning. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据