4.7 Article

Effects of chemical versus enzymatic processing of kenaf fibers on poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate)/poly(butylene adipate -co-terephthalate) composite properties

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 926-933

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.022

关键词

Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Mechanical properties; Thermal analysis; Compression molding

资金

  1. NSF [1114389, 1031828/1031829]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1031828] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1031829] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1114389] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibers from the kenaf plant for composites are extracted using various retting processes. In this paper, we investigate the impact of retting by NaOH alkaline soak and enzymatic retting using pectinase on the crystallization and mechanical performance of a biopolymer blend of poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate)/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate). Two fiber lengths, 5 and 10 mm and a hybrid 1:1 fiber mixture were utilized. From DMA results, the NaOH retted fibers showed synergistic benefits of using hybrid fiber lengths on modulus. The pectinase retted samples did not show synergistic benefits of fiber lengths but composites of the same fiber length retted by pectinase outperformed the corresponding composites with NaOH retted fibers. The fiber retting method also affected recrystallization of the biopolymer. Pectinase retting showed a higher recrystallization temperature than NaOH retting. Transcrystallization resulting from fiber presence was analyzed using polarized optical microscopy. ESEM revealed smoother surfaces on the pectinase retted fibers compared to NaOH. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据