4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of carbon and carbon/zeolite membranes from ODPA-ODA type polyetherimide

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 474, 期 -, 页码 114-121

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.054

关键词

Polyetherimide; Carbon membranes; Zeolite; Gas permeation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20906063]
  2. Liaoning Natural Science Foundation of China [20102170]
  3. Program for Liaoning Excellent Talents in University [LJQ2012010]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals [KF1107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel precursor, 3,3',4,4'-oxydiphthalic dianhydride-4,4'-oxydianiline (ODPA-ODA) type polyetherimide (PEI), was synthesized and used to prepare carbon membranes by preoxidation and heat treatment. The thermal stability of the ODPA-ODA type PEI was evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis. The surface properties, elemental composition, microstructure, morphology and gas separation performance of the as-made carbon membranes were examined by the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, elemental analysis, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and gas permeation techniques. The effects of the preoxidation temperature and zeolite incorporation on the microstructure and gas separation performance of carbon membranes were investigated. The results have shown that ODPA-ODA type PEI is a good precursor for producing carbon membranes. The preoxidation of the ODPA-ODA type PEI is essential to make defect-free carbon membranes, which also helps to improve the thermal stability and porosity during pyrolysis by forming crosslinking structure in precursor. The carbon membranes made after preoxidation at 480 degrees C and heat treatment at 650 degrees C have an oxygen permeability of 131.5 Barrer and an ideal O-2/N-2 selectivity of 9.7. The incorporation of ZSM-5 into the carbon membranes further helps to improve the separation performance of the carbon/zeolite membranes for H-2/N-2 gas mixture. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据