4.5 Article

An Extended TODIM Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Based on 2-Dimension Uncertain Linguistic Variable

期刊

COMPLEXITY
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 20-30

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1002/cplx.21625

关键词

TODIM method; 2-dimension uncertain linguistic variable; multiple attribute group decision making; prospect theory

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71471172, 71271124]
  2. Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project of Ministry of Education of China [13YJC630104]
  3. Shandong Provincial Social Science Planning Project [13BGLJ10]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2011FM036]
  5. Graduate education innovation projects in Shandong Province [SDYY12065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The significant characteristic of the TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of Interactive and Multiple Attribute Decision Making) method is that it can consider the bounded rationality of the decision makers. However, in the classical TODIMmethod, the rating of the attributes only can be used in the form of crisp numbers. Because 2-dimension uncertain linguistic variables can easily express the fuzzy information, in this article, we extend the TODIM method to 2-dimension uncertain linguistic information. First of all, the definition, characteristics, expectation, comparative method and distance of 2-dimension uncertain linguistic information are introduced, and the steps of the classical TODIM method for Multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems are presented. Second, on the basis of the classical TODIM method, the extended TODIM method is proposed to deal with MADM problems in which the attribute values are in the form of 2-dimension uncertain linguistic variables, and detailed decision steps are given. Its significant characteristic is that it can fully consider the bounded rationality of the decision makers, which is a real action in real decision making. Finally, a numerical example is provided to verify the developed approach and its practicality and effectiveness. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据