4.5 Article

A detailed safety assessment of a saw palmetto extract

期刊

COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 147-154

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2007.10.005

关键词

saw palmetto; drug toxicity; benign prostatic; hyperplasia

资金

  1. NCCIH NIH HHS [K08 AT001338] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK056199-01, R01 DK56199] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Saw palmetto is commonly used by men for tower-urinary tract symptoms. Despite its widespread use, very little is known about the potential toxicity of this dietary supplement. Methods: The Saw palmetto for Treatment of Enlarged Prostates (STEP) study was a randomized clinical trial performed among 225 men with mode rate-to-severe symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia, comparing a standardized extract of the saw palmetto berry (160 mg twice daily) with a placebo over a 1-year period. As part of this study, detailed data were collected on serious and non-serious adverse events, sexual functioning, and laboratory tests of blood and urine. Between-group differences were assessed with mixed-effects regression models. Results: There were no significant differences observed between the saw palmetto and placebo-allocated participants in the risk of suffering at least one serious adverse event (5.4% vs. 9.7%, respectively; p = 0.31) or non-serious symptomatic adverse event (34.8% vs. 30.1%, p = 0.48). There were few significant between-group differences in sexual functioning or for most laboratory analyses, with only small differences observed in changes over time in total bilirubin (p = 0.001), potassium (p = 0.03), and the incidence of glycosuria (0% in the saw palmetto group vs. 3.7% in the placebo group, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Despite careful assessment, no evidence for serious toxicity of saw palmetto was observed in this clinical trial. Given the sample size and length of this study, however, these data do not rule out potential rare adverse effects associated with the use of saw palmetto. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据